Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

William Donnell Barrow appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence. * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barrow, No. 2:11-cr-00029-D-1 (E.D.N.C. May 12, 2017). We deny Barrow’s motion for a transcript at government expense and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED