Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this cirpuit.

Larry James Tyler appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tyler v. Jones, No. 4:17-cv-00404-MGL, 2017 WL 1177093 (D.S.C. Mar. 30, 2017). We deny Tyler’s request for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the ma *117 terials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED