U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley

Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 24, 2017 · Traxler, Wynn, Hamilton
696 F. App'x 625

Richard Montgomery v. Joe Coakley

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Richard Montgomery, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant Montgomery’s motion to amend his informal brief, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Montgomery v. Coakley, No. 3:16-cv-00056-GMG-MJA, 2017 WL 1129977 (N.D. W. Va. Mar. 24, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.