U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Theodus Lindsay, Jr. v. William Glick, III

Theodus Lindsay, Jr. v. William Glick, III
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 25, 2017 · Shedd, Thacker, Hamilton
696 F. App'x 635

Theodus Lindsay, Jr. v. William Glick, III

Opinion

*636 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Theodus Lindsay, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Lindsay’s motion to appoint counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Lindsay v. Glick, No. l:15-cv-00596-LCB-JLW, 2017 WL 1034791 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.