Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Cheryl Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint as barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Jones’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Jones has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s- judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and ar *648 gument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED