U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Eddie Pearson

Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Eddie Pearson
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 20, 2017 · Gregory, Niemeyer, Per Curiam, Shedd
697 F. App'x 221

Momolu Sirleaf, Jr. v. Eddie Pearson

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Momolu V.S. Sirleaf, Jr., appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Sirleaf v. Pearson, No. 3:15-cv-00301-MHL-RCY, 2017 WL 655173 (E.D. Va. Feb. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.