U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning

Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 21, 2017 · Wilkinson, Niemeyer, Motz
697 F. App'x 225

Mirna Rodriquez v. Eric Fanning

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Mirna Rodriquez appeals the district court’s orders deeming the Appellee’s statement of undisputed facts as admitted and denying reconsideration, and granting summary judgment in favor of the Appel-lee on Rodriquez’s claims of discrimination and retaliation. We have reviewed the rec *226 ord and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rodriquez v. Fanning, No. 1:15-cv-01654-TSE-JFA (E.D. Va. Nov. 22 & Dec. 16, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.