Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Daniel Rose appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Rose v. Jones, No. 2:17-cv-00226-AWA-RJK (E.D. Va. filed May 15, 2017, entered May 16, 2017), We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED