William Staples v. Joe Coakley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
William Staples v. Joe Coakley, 698 F. App'x 89 (4th Cir. 2017)

William Staples v. Joe Coakley

Opinion

*90 Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Staples, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Staples v. Coakley, No. 1:16-cv-00041-IMK-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Feb. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
William STAPLES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Warden Joe COAKLEY, Respondent-Appellee, and Terry O’Brien, Warden at USP-HAZ, Respondent
Status
Unpublished