William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Morrisey, No. 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT, 2017 WL 1074285 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- William A. TACCINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick MORRISEY; Sue Robey; J. Courrier; Joe E. Miller; James Davis; Trooper John Droppleman; Nelson Michael; Michael Shay; Keith Bradshaw; Bridget Cohee; Tracey B. Eberling; Jason P. Foster; Ralph Brady, Defendants-Appellees
- Cited By
- 1 case
- Status
- Unpublished