William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey, 698 F. App'x 97 (4th Cir. 2017)

William Taccino v. Patrick Morrisey

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William A. Taccino appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Taccino v. Morrisey, No. 3:16-cv-00164-GMG-RWT, 2017 WL 1074285 (N.D.W. Va. Mar. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
William A. TACCINO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Patrick MORRISEY; Sue Robey; J. Courrier; Joe E. Miller; James Davis; Trooper John Droppleman; Nelson Michael; Michael Shay; Keith Bradshaw; Bridget Cohee; Tracey B. Eberling; Jason P. Foster; Ralph Brady, Defendants-Appellees
Cited By
1 case
Status
Unpublished