Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman, 699 F. App'x 185 (4th Cir. 2017)
Floyd, Hamilton, Harris, Per Curiam

Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her motion for a temporary restraining order and her motions for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and' collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Bell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, although we grant Bell’s motion to expedite, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Reference

Full Case Name
Yolanda BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Anne M. HEISHMAN; Kenneth Labowitz; Saben Johnston, Esquire; Blankenship & Keith; Inova Health Care, D/B/A INOVA Fairfax Hospital; Beverly Enterprises Virginia, Inc., D/B/A Golden Living Centers-Sleepy Hollow, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished