U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman

Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 19, 2017 · Floyd, Hamilton, Harris, Per Curiam
699 F. App'x 185

Yolanda Bell v. Anne Heishman

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Yolanda Bell seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying her motion for a temporary restraining order and her motions for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and' collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Bell seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, although we grant Bell’s motion to expedite, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.