U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

United States v. Reginald Falice

United States v. Reginald Falice
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 27, 2017 · Wynn, Thacker, Hamilton
704 F. App'x 256

United States v. Reginald Falice

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

■ Reginald Felice appeals the district court’s text order denying his motion to dismiss his federal criminal conviction for lack of jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. See United States v. Falice, No. 3:98-cr-00244-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 20, 2017).

We deny Falice’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.