Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Marcus L. Hall has noted an appeal from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report.and recommendation and remanding a removed foreclosure action to South Carolina state court. “[A] district court may remand a case ma sponte for lack of subject matter jurisdiction at any time, 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) [ (2012) ], and such an order is not renewable.” Doe v. Blair, 819 F.3d 64, 66-67 (4th Cir. 2016). The district court remanded Hall’s action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction because the complaint did not present a federal question or diversity of citizenship. Because the district court remanded the action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, we lack jurisdiction to review its order. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED