Freddie Andaya v. Detective J.P. McClaskey
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Freddie Andaya appeals the magistrate judge’s text order 1 denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in which he asserted that the magistrate judge made a mistake by not appointing counsel to represent him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) excessive force action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Andaya v. McClaskey, No. 1:12-cv-00093-LPA (M.D.N.C. July 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Freddie ANDAYA, A/K/A Raymond Garcia, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Detective J.P. MCCLASKEY, Det. City of Concord Police Department; Detective K. Childers; Detective R. Gonsalez; United States of America; Detective Kelly Seagraves; Detective Elizabeth Love; Detective G. Bacote; Detective J. Davis; Sheriff Kevin Auten; Detective Uvaldo Rios, Defendants-Appellees, and City of Concord, North Carolina; Rowan County, North Carolina; Chief Guy Smith, Defendants
- Status
- Unpublished