U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

Freddie Andaya v. Detective J.P. McClaskey

Freddie Andaya v. Detective J.P. McClaskey
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 28, 2017 · Duncan, Hamilton, Per Curiam, Wilkinson
707 F. App'x 772

Freddie Andaya v. Detective J.P. McClaskey

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Freddie Andaya appeals the magistrate judge’s text order 1 denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion in which he asserted that the magistrate judge made a mistake by not appointing counsel to represent him in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) excessive force action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Andaya v. McClaskey, No. 1:12-cv-00093-LPA (M.D.N.C. July 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

1

. The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2012).

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.