Marshall v. Payne

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 3, 2017

Marshall v. Payne, 675 F. App'x 356 (4th Cir. 2017)

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kalvin Marshall appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reopen his Bivens * action which was dismissed in April 2015. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Marshall v. Payne, No. 3:13— cv-00286-JRS (E.D. Va. Sept. 19, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971).

Reference

Full Case Name: Kalvin MARSHALL v. Robert E. PAYNE, Judge Henry E. Hudson, Judge
Status: Published