U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2017

McFadden v. Bittinger

McFadden v. Bittinger
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided October 20, 2017 · Floyd, Hamilton, Harris
699 F. App'x 206

McFadden v. Bittinger

Opinion of the Court

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard McFadden appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint and denying his motion to alter or amend the judgment, Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. McFadden v. Bittinger, No. 2:15-cv-02507-JMC, 2017 WL 1044845 (D.S.C. Mar. 20, 2017 & May 30, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.