U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

David Harvey v. J. G. Cline

David Harvey v. J. G. Cline
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 11, 2018

David Harvey v. J. G. Cline

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-1903

DAVID MATTHEW HARVEY, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. J. G. CLINE; ROBERT S. CASTLE; TYLER NELSON; SHANE WOODRUM; and TIMOTHY BROWNING, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Charleston. John T. Copenhaver, Jr., District Judge. (2:15-cv-14091)

Submitted: December 28, 2017 Decided: January 11, 2018

Before KING, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lonnie C. Simmons, DITRAPANO, BARRETT, DIPIERO, MCGINLEY & SIMMONS PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellant. M. Andrew Brison, Valerie F. Price, ANSPACH MEEKS ELLENBERGER LLP, Charleston, West Virginia; Stephanie H.

Ojeda, Mark W. Browning, HENDRICKSON & LONG, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: David Matthew Harvey appeals the district court’s orders granting the Defendants’ motions to dismiss his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Harvey v. Cline, No. 2:15-cv-14091 (S.D.W. Va. Aug. 1, 2017; July 1, 2016; Apr. 18, 2016); see also Magee v. Racing Corp. of W. Va., 2017 WL 4993455 (W. Va. Nov. 1, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.