Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

John Paul Smith appeals the district court’s order granting him a sentence reduction pursuant to his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion based on Amendment 782. On appeal, Smith argues the district court erred in not appointing him counsel and conducting a hearing based on Amendment 657, and in its finding of actual oxycodone for which he was accountable. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Smith, No. 3:02-cr-00064-GMG-7 (N.D.W. Va. Aug. 14, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED