Roscoe Artis v. Earl H. Strickland

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Roscoe Artis v. Earl H. Strickland, 709 F. App'x 204 (4th Cir. 2018)

Roscoe Artis v. Earl H. Strickland

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Roscoe Artis appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) (2012). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Artis v. Strickland, No. 5:17-ct-03065-BO (E.D.N.C. Aug. 11, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Roscoe ARTIS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Earl H. STRICKLAND; North Carolina State Bar, Defendants-Appellees
Status
Unpublished