Janice Grenadier v. James Clark

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit February 1, 2018

Janice Grenadier v. James Clark, 710 F. App'x 147 (4th Cir. 2018)

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Janice Wolk Grenadier appeals the district court’s orders dismissing her suit against a state judge and denying various motions. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Grenadier v. Clark, No. 1:17-cv-00280-CMH-JFA (E.D. Va. Apr. 21, 2017; May 23, 2017; June 2 & 23, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts’and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name: Janice Wolk GRENADIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James C. CLARK, Judge, in His Personal and Professional Capacity, Defendant-Appellee
Status: Unpublished