United States v. Michael Cromwell
United States v. Michael Cromwell
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Michael Cromwell appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. * United States v. Cromwell, No. 2:11-cr-00009-AWA-DEM-1 (E.D. Va. Sept. 15, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Because Cromwell does not challenge on appeal the district court's disposition of his claim based on Amendment 750 to the Sentencing Guidelines, he has forfeited appellate review of that issue, See 4th Cir. R, 34(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.