Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as well as its Order denying Banks’ self-styled . motion to vacate that order and judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Banks v. Ratledge, No. 5:16-hc-02219-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2017 & Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE; Mark Hornak; David Hicton; Robert Cessar; United States Marshals Service; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Respondents-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished