Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge, 710 F. App'x 177 (4th Cir. 2018)

Frederick Hamilton Banks v. Charles Ratledge

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Hamilton Banks appeals the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition, as well as its Order denying Banks’ self-styled . motion to vacate that order and judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders. See Banks v. Ratledge, No. 5:16-hc-02219-D (E.D.N.C. Aug. 14, 2017 & Oct. 10, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Frederick Hamilton BANKS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Charles RATLEDGE; Mark Hornak; David Hicton; Robert Cessar; United States Marshals Service; Jefferson B. Sessions III, Respondents-Appellees
Status
Unpublished