Frederick Banks v. Felicia Langford
Frederick Banks v. Felicia Langford
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Frederick Banks appeals the district court’s order dismissing Banks’ complaint, in part, to the extent that Banks sought habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012). * We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We thus affirm the district court’s judgment. See Banks v. Langford, No. 5:17-ct-03057-FL (E.D.N.C. Oct. 2, 2017 & Oct. 26, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal- contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
To the extent Banks sought to assert a civil rights action, the district court denied Banks’ application to proceed without prepayment of fees and directed Banks to pay the full filing fee within 14 days of the court's order, and ultimately dismissed Banks’ action when he failed to do so. Because Banks does not challenge this portion of the district court’s order, we need not review it on appeal. See 4th Cir. R, 34(b).
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.