Thomas Browning v. A. Mansukhani
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Thomas William Browning appeals the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion. See Aikens v. Ingram, 652 F.3d 496, 501 (4th Cir. 2011) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process."'
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Thomas William BROWNING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. A. MANSUKHANI, Warden Federal Correctional Inst—Estill, Respondent-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished