Daniel H. King v. T. Smith
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Daniel H. King, a District of Columbia Code offender civilly committed under the Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. King v. Smith, No, 5:16-hc-02291-D, 2017 WL 4621778 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 16, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Daniel H. KING, Petitioner-Appellant, v. T. SMITH, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
- Status
- Unpublished