Luscious Graham v. Antero Resources Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Luscious Graham v. Antero Resources Corporation, 714 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2018)

Luscious Graham v. Antero Resources Corporation

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Luscious Graham filed a civil action in West Virginia state court, which the Defendant removed to federal district court based on diversity jurisdiction. The district court denied Graham’s subsequent motion to remand to state court and ultimately granted summary judgment to the Defendant. Graham’s sole challenge on appeal is to the district court’s order finding diversity jurisdiction and denying her motion to remand. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Graham v. Antero Res. Corp., No. 1:16-cv-00026-FPS-MJA, 2017 WL 1345038 (N.D.W. Va. July 26, 2016; Apr. 7, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Reference

Full Case Name
Luscious GRAHAM, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant-Appellee
Status
Unpublished