Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

Barbara L. Combs seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing, without prejudice, Count One of her civil complaint, and dismissing the remainder of the complaint with prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-47, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The district court stated that the identified deficiencies in Count One of Combs’ complaint may be remedied through the filing of an amended complaint with additional factual details supporting the claim. Therefore, we conclude that the order Combs seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Goode v. Cent. Va. Legal Aid Soc’y, Inc., 807 F.3d 619, 623 (4th Cir. 2015); Domino Sugar Corp. v. Sugar Workers Local Union 392, 10 F.3d 1064, 1066-67 (4th Cir. 1993).

Accordingly, we grant Appellees’ motion to dismiss, dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and remand the case to the district court with instructions to allow Combs to file an amended complaint as to Count One. * We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED AND REMANDED