Raheem Jones v. Lieutenant Curry
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Raheem L. Jones appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint as barred by the applicable statute of limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Jones v. Curry, No. 1:17-cv-01216-TSE-MSN (E.D. Va. Dec. 21, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Raheem L. JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Lieutenant CURRY, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Lieutenant Dyson, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Lieutenant Griffen, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Correctional Officer Benz, Pod Officer; Correctional Officer Hudson, Pod Officer; Correctional Officer Latif, Pod Officer; Correctional Officer Myrick, Pod Officer; Lieutenant Allen, Lieutenant/Building Supervisor; Ms. Witt, Grievance Coordinator; Grant, Unit Manager; Tameka Jones, Building Counselor; Ms. William, Mental Health Counselor; Nurse Marland, Medical Department; Nurse Thigpen, Medical Department; Nurse Thweatt, Medical Department, Defendants-Appellees
- Status
- Unpublished