Casey Luczak v. Joe Coakley

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Casey Luczak v. Joe Coakley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7583

MR. CASEY LUCZAK,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

JOE COAKLEY, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00086-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Casey Luczak, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Casey Luczak, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief

on his

28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Luczak v. Coakley, No. 3:17-cv-00086-

GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished