U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

Casey Luczak v. Joe Coakley

Casey Luczak v. Joe Coakley
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 16, 2018

Casey Luczak v. Joe Coakley

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7583

MR. CASEY LUCZAK, Petitioner - Appellant, v. JOE COAKLEY, Warden, Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:17-cv-00086-GMG-RWT)

Submitted: March 13, 2018 Decided: March 16, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Casey Luczak, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Casey Luczak, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Luczak v. Coakley, No. 3:17-cv-00086- GMG-RWT (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 31, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.