Kelvin Canada v. Harold Clarke
Kelvin Canada v. Harold Clarke
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-7448
KELVIN A. CANADA, Plaintiff - Appellant, and KEVIN BATTE; LYNELL HILL; FRANCISCO VIGIL; ERIC BARNARD, Plaintiffs, v. HAROLD W. CLARKE, VA DOC Director; DAVID ROBINSON, Chief of CORR. Operations; RANDALL MATHENA, Warden; GERALD KEITH WASHINGTON, Regional Operation Chief; JEFFERY ARTRIP, Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Manager; DUAL TREATMENT TEAM, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James P. Jones, District Judge. (7:15-cv-00065-JPJ-RSB)
Submitted: March 16, 2018 Decided: April 4, 2018
Before KING, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kelvin A. Canada, Appellant Pro Se. Nancy Hull Davidson, Assistant Attorney General, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Kelvin A. Canada appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Defendants in Canada’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Canada v. Clarke, No. 7:15-cv-00065-JPJ-RSB (W.D. Va. Sept. 27, 2016).
We deny Canada’s motions for appointment of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.