Mark Duncan v. Shirley McKinney

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Mark Duncan v. Shirley McKinney

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1090

MARK J. DUNCAN; IRIS S. DUNCAN,

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

v.

SHIRLEY GIBSON MCKINNEY; ROBERT MCKINNEY; SARAH HUDSON; WALMART CORPORATION; GREGG BRADLEY,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:17-cv-01026-LCB-JEP)

Submitted: April 17, 2018 Decided: April 20, 2018

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mark J. Duncan and Iris S. Duncan, Appellants Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Mark J. Duncan and Iris S. Duncan appeal the district court’s order accepting the

recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing their

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012)

complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have reviewed the record and

find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for the reasons

stated by the district court. Duncan v. McKinney, No. 1:17-cv-01026-LCB-JEP

(M.D.N.C., Jan. 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished