William Feegba v. George Bush
William Feegba v. George Bush
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1272
WILLIAM FEEGBA, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GEORGE BUSH; MITT ROMNEY, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.
Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:17-cv-03725-ELH)
Submitted: April 19, 2018 Decided: April 24, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
William Feegba, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: William Feegba appeals the district court’s order dismissing his complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction as frivolous. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Feegba’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Feegba has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 (4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.