U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

Toby Mackall v. US Department Of Defense

Toby Mackall v. US Department Of Defense
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided May 8, 2018

Toby Mackall v. US Department Of Defense

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-2435

TOBY ROBERTO MACKALL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; CLARK W. LEMASTERS, JR., Major General, U.S. Army, TACOM Commanding General; TIMOTHY D.

LUEDECKING, Colonel, U.S. Army, Military Assistant, OUSD ATL; MYRON L.

BELL, Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army; MATTHEW D. TOBIN, Major, U.S. Army, Detailed Inspector General, Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

Richard D. Bennett, District Judge. (1:17-cv-00774-RDB)

Submitted: April 26, 2018 Decided: May 8, 2018

Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Toby Roberto Mackall, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Toby Roberto Mackall appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint asserting claims under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671-2680 (2012), and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Mackall v. Dep’t of Defense, No. 1:17- cv-00774-RDB (D. Md. Nov. 20, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.