John James Bell v. South Carolina
John James Bell v. South Carolina
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6068
JOHN JAMES BELL, Petitioner - Appellant, v. SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. (2:17-cv-02176-TMC)
Submitted: May 15, 2018 Decided: May 25, 2018
Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John James Bell, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: John James Bell appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing his petition for a writ of mandamus. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Bell v. South Carolina, No. 2:17-cv-02176-TMC (D.S.C. Jan. 2, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.