CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Montgomery Sibley
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 16-2305
CARMAX AUTO SUPERSTORES, INC., Plaintiff - Appellee, v. MONTGOMERY B. SIBLEY, Defendant - Appellant, v. RICHARD W. BLACK; LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.; JOSHUA B. WAXMAN, Third Party Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.
Roger W. Titus, Senior District Judge. (8:16-cv-01459-RWT)
Submitted: June 29, 2018 Decided: July 12, 2018
Before WILKINSON and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Montgomery B. Sibley, Appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Bresnahan, Adam Joel Singer, VORYS, SATER, SEYMOUR & PEASE, Washington, D.C.; Steven E. Kaplan, Joshua B. Waxman, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM: Montgomery B. Sibley appeals the district court’s orders granting Appellees’ motion to dismiss and motion for summary judgment and denying his motion for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc. v. Sibley, No. 8:16-cv-01459-RWT (D. Md. July 13, 2016; filed Oct. 14, 2016 & entered Oct. 17, 2016). We further grant CarMax’s motions to supplement the record and to strike, grant Sibley leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and deny as moot Sibley’s motion to expedite and to remove this case from abeyance. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.