U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

In re: Kareem Currence

In re: Kareem Currence
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2018

In re: Kareem Currence

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1498

In re: KAREEM JAMAL CURRENCE, Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (5:18-ct-03038-BO)

Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kareem Jamal Currence, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Kareem Jamal Currence petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that a United States Magistrate Judge has unduly delayed his civil rights action, and he seeks an order from this court directing the judge to act. The present record reveals no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.