U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

Arkeem Nellon v. Regina Hampton

Arkeem Nellon v. Regina Hampton
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 23, 2018

Arkeem Nellon v. Regina Hampton

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6166

ARKEEM H. NELLON, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. LIEUTENANT REGINA HAMPTON, Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00592-LCB-JEP)

Submitted: July 19, 2018 Decided: July 23, 2018

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Arkeem H. Nellon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Arkeem H. Nellon appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and advised Nellon that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.

The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. United States v. Midgette, 478 F.3d 616, 621 (4th Cir. 2007). Nellon has waived appellate review by failing to file objections after receiving proper notice. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district court.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.