U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 2018

In re: Starsha Sewell

In re: Starsha Sewell
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 26, 2018

In re: Starsha Sewell

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1298

In re: STARSHA M. SEWELL, Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore.

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:18-mc-00114)

Submitted: June 12, 2018 Decided: July 26, 2018

Before DUNCAN, DIAZ, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Starsha M. Sewell, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM: Starsha M. Sewell appeals the district court’s order imposing a prefiling injunction after considering Sewell’s response to a show cause order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. In re Sewell, No. 1:18-mc-00114 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.