Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
Charles Tunstall v. Frank Perry
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6285
CHARLES ALONZO TUNSTALL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
FRANK L. PERRY; BEVERLY STUBBS, RN; DR. SAMI HASSAN; JANE WELCH, Head Nurse; MS. PADGEANT; LETITIA OWENS; CAPTAIN BROCKINGTON; MS. FALCON; PAULA Y. SMITH,
Defendants - Appellees,
and
DR. CHARLES STEWART; PETER WOGLOM; DR ARTHUR DAVIS; DR. SAMUEL MICKLOS; DR. KEYSER; MS. CARMEN S. HENDRICKS,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Loretta C. Biggs, District Judge. (1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP)
Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 20, 2018
Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles Alonzo Tunstall, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Charles Alonzo Tunstall appeals the district court’s orders accepting the
recommendations of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Tunstall v. Perry, No.
1:15-cv-00226-LCB-JEP (M.D.N.C. Sept. 19, 2016; June 22, 2017; Jan. 5, 2018). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished