James Armistead v. Jennie Bowen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

James Armistead v. Jennie Bowen

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6449

JAMES GREGORY ARMISTEAD,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JENNIE BOWEN; TIMOTHY WARE; ROGER SHACKLEFORD; MOSE DORSEY; SETH EDWARDS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:17-ct-03281-BO)

Submitted: August 10, 2018 Decided: August 31, 2018

Before NIEMEYER, TRAXLER, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James G. Armistead, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

James Gregory Armistead appeals the district court’s order dismissing his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint under

28 U.S.C. § 1915

(e)(2)(B) (2012). We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. See Armistead v. Bowen, No. 5:17-ct-03281-BO (E.D.N.C.

Apr. 13, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid

the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished