Richard Lamb v. South Carolina DMV Office

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Richard Lamb v. South Carolina DMV Office

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-1593

RICHARD B. LAMB,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN)

Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018

Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Richard B. Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Richard B. Lamb appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his

42 U.S.C. § 1983

(2012) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. SC Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, No. 0:18-cv-

00552-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished