Richard Lamb v. South Carolina DMV Office
Richard Lamb v. South Carolina DMV Office
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1593
RICHARD B. LAMB,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA DMV OFFICE; SFAA INSURANCE RESERVE FUND; KEVIN SHWEDO; WILLIAM C. WANNAMAKER; MARCIA ADAMS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Rock Hill. David C. Norton, District Judge. (0:18-cv-00552-DCN)
Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard B. Lamb, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Richard B. Lamb appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation
of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his
42 U.S.C. § 1983(2012) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Lamb v. SC Dep’t of Motor Vehicles, No. 0:18-cv-
00552-DCN (D.S.C. Apr. 24, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished