Jupiter Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake
Jupiter Wilson, Sr. v. City of Chesapeake
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1462
JUPITER DENNELL WILSON, SR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE, in its Official Capacity,
Defendant - Appellee,
and
CITY OF CHESAPEAKE FIRE DEPARTMENT; BATTALION CHIEF CARL ACKISS, in his official capacity; FIRE FIGHTER WILLIAM COPELAND, in his official capacity,
Defendants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Douglas E. Miller, Magistrate Judge. (2:16-cv-00301-DEM)
Submitted: September 13, 2018 Decided: September 17, 2018
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Melissa A. Hamann, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, Chesapeake, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Jupiter Dennell Wilson, Sr., appeals the magistrate judge’s * orders granting the
City of Chesapeake summary judgment on his discrimination and retaliation claims,
brought pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to
2000e-17 (West 2012 & Supp. 2018), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of
1967,
29 U.S.C.A. §§ 621to 634 (West 2018), and denying Wilson’s Fed. R. Civ. P.
59(e) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm the district court’s orders. See Wilson v. City of Chesapeake, No. 2:16-cv-
00301-DEM (E.D. Va. Feb. 12, 2018 & April 17, 2018). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(2) (2012).
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished