Victor Perkins v. John Ashcroft
Victor Perkins v. John Ashcroft
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1821
VICTOR BERNARD PERKINS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN ASHCROFT; ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.; LORETTA LYNCH,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:18-ct-03014-D)
Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 20, 2018
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Victor Bernard Perkins, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Victor Bernard Perkins appeals the district court’s order and judgment dismissing
his complaint as frivolous under
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) (2012). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Perkins v. Ashcroft, No. 5:18-
ct-03014-D (E.D.N.C. July 11, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished