United States v. Rico Ham
United States v. Rico Ham
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-6623
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICO HAM, a/k/a Rico Hamm, a/k/a Reco Ham, a/k/a Reco Hamm, a/k/a Rico Hamm, Jr., a/k/a Reco Hamm, Jr.,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Senior District Judge. (3:13-cr-00488-JFA-1)
Submitted: September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018
Before WILKINSON and THACKER, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Rico Ham, Appellant Pro Se. William Kenneth Witherspoon, Assistant United States Attorney, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Rico Ham seeks to appeal the district court’s order ruling on a postjudgment
motion. We lack jurisdiction to review the district court’s order and, thus, dismiss this
appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished