Mengistu Taye v. Jefferson Sessions III
Mengistu Taye v. Jefferson Sessions III
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 18-1361
MENGISTU TAYE,
Petitioner,
v.
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.
Submitted: September 20, 2018 Decided: October 4, 2018
Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.
Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mengistu Taye, Petitioner Pro Se. Jessica Eden Burns, John Frederick Stanton, Office of Immigration Litigation, Claire L. Workman, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Mengistu Taye, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review of an order of
the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) denying his motion to reconsider its denial of
his seventh motion to reopen. Because Taye fails to raise any arguments that challenge the
propriety of the Board’s denial of his motion to reconsider in his informal brief, we find
that he has failed to preserve any issues for review. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b) (directing
appealing parties to present specific arguments in an informal brief and stating that this
court’s review on appeal is limited to the issues raised in the informal brief). Accordingly,
we deny the petition for review. See In re Taye (B.I.A. Mar. 6, 2018). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished