Percy Tucker v. Jefferson Sessions III

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Percy Tucker v. Jefferson Sessions III

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-7392

PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ LINDSLEY, Unit Manager,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 17-7393

PERCY J. TUCKER, a/k/a Percy James Tucker,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; CHARLES SAMUELS, Director, Bureau of Prisons; HARRY ATKINSON, Complex Warden; JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, FCI-2; MR. JOHNSON, Assistant Warden; LIZ LINDSLEY, Unit Manager,

Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. (5:15-ct-03307-D)

Submitted: October 2, 2018 Decided: October 16, 2018

Before MOTZ, KEENAN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Percy James Tucker, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Percy J. Tucker appeals the district court’s orders accepting the recommendation

of the magistrate judge, dismissing his civil complaint, and denying reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. See Tucker v. Lynch, No. 5:15-ct-03307-D (E.D.N.C.

Feb. 22, 2018; Oct. 4, 2017; Mar. 28, 2017). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

3

Reference

Status
Unpublished