Channack Keam v. Leroy Cartledge
Channack Keam v. Leroy Cartledge
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 17-7617
CHANNACK KEAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LEROY CARTLEDGE,
Respondent - Appellee.
No. 18-6661
CHANNACK KEAM,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
LEROY CARTLEDGE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. J. Michelle Childs, District Judge. (6:16-cv-03245-JMC)
Submitted: October 23, 2018 Decided: October 25, 2018 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Channack Keam, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Channack Keam seeks to appeal the district court’s
order denying a certificate of appealability as to his
28 U.S.C. § 2254(2012) petition.
The district court referred this case to a magistrate judge pursuant to
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) (2012). The magistrate judge recommended that relief be denied and
advised Keam that failure to file timely objections to this recommendation could waive
appellate review of a district court order based upon the recommendation.
The timely filing of specific objections to a magistrate judge’s recommendation is
necessary to preserve appellate review of the substance of that recommendation when the
parties have been warned of the consequences of noncompliance. Wright v. Collins,
766 F.2d 841, 845-46(4th Cir. 1985); see also Thomas v. Arn,
474 U.S. 140(1985). Keam
has waived appellate review by failing to timely file objections. Accordingly, we deny a
certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the
appeals.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
3
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished